撤销权论文：撤销权诉讼研究
【中文摘要】1999年颁布的《中华人民共和国合同法》第74、75条规定了撤销权制度,撤销权制度的设立对健全社会主义市场经济的法律规则具有重要的理论和现实意义,但因该条文过简,概述不完整,容易引起理解差异和适用困难。由于撤销权的行使是以突破合同相对性为代价的,而合同相对性又是维系债权人和债务人关系的基本准则,突破这一原则必然会严重地影响到交易安全,所以审理中既要注意保护债权人的债权,又要兼顾保护债务人的经济自由,也就是要实现维护交易安全与保护债权人利益这两个价值目标之间的平衡。此次《合同法》和最高人民法院出台《关于适用若干问题的解释(一)》关于撤销权的规定尽管基本构划了该制度的实体内容和程序机制,但在撤销权诉讼程序机制运作的诸多环节尚缺乏全面和具体规制,无法满足现实中出现的问题。同时,作为一项新设立的法律规定,学界对此并未给予足够的重视,缺乏深入全面的探讨。故应结合实践,吸收先进理念,加强研究,以期对撤销权诉讼制度加以完善,最大限度地发挥撤销权制度的作用。本文在充分借鉴相关国外有关立法经验的基础上,紧密结合我国撤销权诉讼的司法实践,主要就撤销权诉讼的性质、诉讼标的、诉讼当事人的诉讼地位和撤销权诉讼具体程序问题等问题进行探索和论述。本文主要观点有:撤销权之诉的性质为形成之诉兼给付之诉;撤销权诉讼之管辖性质应为专属地域管辖;撤销权之诉的诉讼标的应为撤销债务人的处分行为和责
任财产恢复原状的请求。撤销权诉讼的既判力及于债权人、债务人和第三人。
【英文摘要】In 1999, People’s Republic of China Law of Contract has been enacted, the 74th and the 75th article of which stipulate the cancellation right. The setting of the cancellation right has a theoretical and practical value of safeguarding the sound development of the socialist market economy. However, this article is simple and difficult to understand and adopt. Because the use of the cancellation right is at the cost of the privity of contract, which is the basic principle connecting obligee and obligor. Breaking this principle influence the safety of the transaction, thus,
attention should be paid to the rights of obligee and obligor during the judgment, that is to say, the safety of the
transaction and the economical freedom of the obligee should be balanced. But, the Contract Law of China ignored the
cancellation right procedural mechanism ---- Proceedings for right of Cancellation.In December ,1999, Supreme People’s Court Certain Questions Explanations about, the 23rd to the 26th article in which expound the 74th and the 75th article of contract law., and finally establish the position of the Cancellation Right in
China’s legal system. As a new law, scholars did not pay much attention to it, and there may be more or less situation in the implementation. So we should apply this law to practical, absorb advanced theory, make the most of the law.This essay based on the legislation’s experience of foreign countries, connecting the proceedings for right of cancellation’s
practice in our country, explored and discussed the conception of the Proceedings for right of cancellation, object of action, the status of litigant and so on. The main point of view of this essay: The nature of proceedings for right of cancellation is the request right suit and given suit. The jurisdiction of Proceedings for right is the exclusive territorial
jurisdiction. The object of action Proceedings for right is that the debtor’s disposition is removed and that recovery original property. Validity of matter adjudged of proceedings for right related creditor debtor and third party.
【关键词】撤销权 诉讼 程序 既判力 【备注】索购全文在线加好友：139938848 .....
同时提供论文写作一对一指导和论文发表委托服务
【英文关键词】the Cancellation Right litigation Procedure Validity of matter adjudged
【目录】撤销权诉讼研究
4-5
9-15
11-13Abstract5-6摘要第一章 撤销权诉讼的属性二、撤销权的本质第二章 撤销权诉一、撤销权制度的特征9-11三、撤销权诉讼之性质13-15
讼的诉讼标的15-17一、诉讼诉标的一般学说15-16
第三章 撤销权诉讼的当事
17二、撤销权之诉的
一、撤销
20二、撤销权诉讼的诉讼标的16-17人17-20被告17-20一、撤销权之诉的原告第四章 撤销权诉讼的程序20-34（一） 撤销权诉讼的程序条件权诉讼的提起20-25
（二） 撤销权诉讼的实质条件20-25
合法有效的债权20-21
21-22
22-231、债权人对债务人享有2、债务人实施了处分财产的行为3、债务人的处分行为须有害债权人的债权4、行为人主观上具有恶意23-255、撤销权行使
（一） 撤的时效条件25
销权诉讼管辖的性质
仲裁的关系25-26二、撤销权诉讼的管辖25-2725（二） 撤销权诉讼的管辖与协议管辖、（三） 涉外撤销权诉讼的管辖26-27
（一） 证明对象27（二）
（一） 三、撤销权诉讼的证明27-29证明责任27-29四、撤销权诉讼裁判的判决29-34
撤销权诉讼的判决及实体拘束力29-31
决的既判力31-34
讼判决的既判力32-34
35-37后记37-38 （二） 撤销权诉讼判2、撤销权诉1、既判力的概述31-32结语34-35参考文献
撤销权论文：撤销权诉讼研究
【中文摘要】1999年颁布的《中华人民共和国合同法》第74、75条规定了撤销权制度,撤销权制度的设立对健全社会主义市场经济的法律规则具有重要的理论和现实意义,但因该条文过简,概述不完整,容易引起理解差异和适用困难。由于撤销权的行使是以突破合同相对性为代价的,而合同相对性又是维系债权人和债务人关系的基本准则,突破这一原则必然会严重地影响到交易安全,所以审理中既要注意保护债权人的债权,又要兼顾保护债务人的经济自由,也就是要实现维护交易安全与保护债权人利益这两个价值目标之间的平衡。此次《合同法》和最高人民法院出台《关于适用若干问题的解释(一)》关于撤销权的规定尽管基本构划了该制度的实体内容和程序机制,但在撤销权诉讼程序机制运作的诸多环节尚缺乏全面和具体规制,无法满足现实中出现的问题。同时,作为一项新设立的法律规定,学界对此并未给予足够的重视,缺乏深入全面的探讨。故应结合实践,吸收先进理念,加强研究,以期对撤销权诉讼制度加以完善,最大限度地发挥撤销权制度的作用。本文在充分借鉴相关国外有关立法经验的基础上,紧密结合我国撤销权诉讼的司法实践,主要就撤销权诉讼的性质、诉讼标的、诉讼当事人的诉讼地位和撤销权诉讼具体程序问题等问题进行探索和论述。本文主要观点有:撤销权之诉的性质为形成之诉兼给付之诉;撤销权诉讼之管辖性质应为专属地域管辖;撤销权之诉的诉讼标的应为撤销债务人的处分行为和责
任财产恢复原状的请求。撤销权诉讼的既判力及于债权人、债务人和第三人。
【英文摘要】In 1999, People’s Republic of China Law of Contract has been enacted, the 74th and the 75th article of which stipulate the cancellation right. The setting of the cancellation right has a theoretical and practical value of safeguarding the sound development of the socialist market economy. However, this article is simple and difficult to understand and adopt. Because the use of the cancellation right is at the cost of the privity of contract, which is the basic principle connecting obligee and obligor. Breaking this principle influence the safety of the transaction, thus,
attention should be paid to the rights of obligee and obligor during the judgment, that is to say, the safety of the
transaction and the economical freedom of the obligee should be balanced. But, the Contract Law of China ignored the
cancellation right procedural mechanism ---- Proceedings for right of Cancellation.In December ,1999, Supreme People’s Court Certain Questions Explanations about, the 23rd to the 26th article in which expound the 74th and the 75th article of contract law., and finally establish the position of the Cancellation Right in
China’s legal system. As a new law, scholars did not pay much attention to it, and there may be more or less situation in the implementation. So we should apply this law to practical, absorb advanced theory, make the most of the law.This essay based on the legislation’s experience of foreign countries, connecting the proceedings for right of cancellation’s
practice in our country, explored and discussed the conception of the Proceedings for right of cancellation, object of action, the status of litigant and so on. The main point of view of this essay: The nature of proceedings for right of cancellation is the request right suit and given suit. The jurisdiction of Proceedings for right is the exclusive territorial
jurisdiction. The object of action Proceedings for right is that the debtor’s disposition is removed and that recovery original property. Validity of matter adjudged of proceedings for right related creditor debtor and third party.
【关键词】撤销权 诉讼 程序 既判力 【备注】索购全文在线加好友：139938848 .....
同时提供论文写作一对一指导和论文发表委托服务
【英文关键词】the Cancellation Right litigation Procedure Validity of matter adjudged
【目录】撤销权诉讼研究
4-5
9-15
11-13Abstract5-6摘要第一章 撤销权诉讼的属性二、撤销权的本质第二章 撤销权诉一、撤销权制度的特征9-11三、撤销权诉讼之性质13-15
讼的诉讼标的15-17一、诉讼诉标的一般学说15-16
第三章 撤销权诉讼的当事
17二、撤销权之诉的
一、撤销
20二、撤销权诉讼的诉讼标的16-17人17-20被告17-20一、撤销权之诉的原告第四章 撤销权诉讼的程序20-34（一） 撤销权诉讼的程序条件权诉讼的提起20-25
（二） 撤销权诉讼的实质条件20-25
合法有效的债权20-21
21-22
22-231、债权人对债务人享有2、债务人实施了处分财产的行为3、债务人的处分行为须有害债权人的债权4、行为人主观上具有恶意23-255、撤销权行使
（一） 撤的时效条件25
销权诉讼管辖的性质
仲裁的关系25-26二、撤销权诉讼的管辖25-2725（二） 撤销权诉讼的管辖与协议管辖、（三） 涉外撤销权诉讼的管辖26-27
（一） 证明对象27（二）
（一） 三、撤销权诉讼的证明27-29证明责任27-29四、撤销权诉讼裁判的判决29-34
撤销权诉讼的判决及实体拘束力29-31
决的既判力31-34
讼判决的既判力32-34
35-37后记37-38 （二） 撤销权诉讼判2、撤销权诉1、既判力的概述31-32结语34-35参考文献