美华媒：中国应坚持“不出头”遗训 不必与美争锋
美国《侨报》网5月31日文章，原题：且让美国“领导世界”
中国只需做好自己美国总统奥巴马在西点军校的演讲中强调美国将在未来领导世界。奥巴马的宣示有一个根本矛盾：以一国去领导世界。如是这样，那么这“一国”的领导人该对谁负责呢？是这“一国”还是全世界？如果美国真的要领导全世界，那么它做好由全世界人民来选举美国总统的准备了么？如果没有，那么这个所谓“美国领导世界”将长久地作为“美国梦”存在。因为，如若美国领导世界，美国总统却仍只由美国人选举，那么美国人势必因为手中的政治权利而成为“特权阶层”。其他民族的人民们怕是不会同意这种不平等秩序的。
美国国力超群，软硬实力俱强。在当今世界的影响力无出其右者。这是当今世界的现实。但影响力与领导力并不等同。其实，民族国家为基本组成的这个国际体系中，任何一个国家都不可能做到真正的领导世界，能够做到在国力和国内治理模式上独领风骚已然不易。相比于所谓领导世界这种大而空的口号，不如在加速全球化发展、优化国家间分歧解决机制等更有实质意义的问题上下功夫。
说到底，这是以民族国家为单位的国际体系的宿命。奥巴马先生怕也是以该体系为前提做出这番表态的，因为他此次演讲的对象是美国民众，他本人更是美国人选出来的总统。恐怕任何一国的元首说出此言都不会受到其他国家的欢迎，因为这话必然隐含着那“一国”凌驾于世界的内涵。这话或许让美国民众感觉受用，但在其他国家民众那里就不是那么回事了。
一国在某一国家群体中发挥领导作用倒是常有的事，无论威斯特伐利亚体系还是维也纳体系，亦或是冷战结束前后的世界都呈现这一特征。北约恰是一个典型。奥巴马若声言美国将长久领导北约，那倒是更能服人。只是，国家群的存在无不以与另一个组织原则与其相悖的国家群或国家的对抗为前提。如此逻辑下，所谓领导世界就更只能是无源之水。如在冷战时期，华约就不在美国的领导之下。
真正推动国际体系远离动荡走向善治的不是某一国的领导地位，而是让各国利益紧密联结的全球化进程。在经济、应对共同挑战等领域的共同利益面前，国家间的利益分歧往往会退居各国战略决策者二线目标行列，让动荡、对抗的爆发空间大大压缩。如何加速全球化进程，夯实各国共同利益，这才是奥巴马们该多多考虑的事情。
对于中国来说，无论美国人说了什么，都同样应当清楚这些年来始终为国家发展提供不竭动力并为其保驾护航的是什么，那恰恰也是全球化进程带来的各国深厚的利益联结。若无此，国际体系轻易异动，中国快速发展的稳定大环境也许早已不复存在。中国外交在新领导层主政之下变得愈发进取，这是明显的趋势。这不仅体现在对自身地缘利益更积极地去维护、争取，更体现在对西方言论更加自信、直接的反驳上。此次奥巴马的“领导世界”宣言同样被中国外交部顶了回去。
战术层面可以更加主动，嘴上可以更加自信，但千万不可因为西方说了什么或做了什么就在战略上忽视中国与西方在经济及应对共同威胁时的共同利益。奥巴马的话固然不受听，美国对中国的围堵固然让人恼火，但若因此就让中国外交滑向了与西方对抗为主的轨道上，那无疑是有失明智的。美国如果要挑头，就让他挑好了。中国不必与之争锋。 “不出头”
是邓小平留下的遗训。继续从全球化合作中汲取养分，继续埋头做好自己的事情才是中国的智慧选择。
The network May 31 articles qiaobao, the original problem: and for the United States to "lead the world"
China need to do their U.S. President barack Obama's speech at west point highlighted in the United States will lead the world in the future. Barack Obama declared a fundamental paradox: a country to lead the world. So, then this to the "one country" leader who is responsible? Is this the "one country, or the world?" If America is to lead the world, do it well by people all over the world ready for the election of the President of the United States? If not, then the so-called "America lead the world" will be there for long as the "American dream". Because, if the United States leads the world, the President of the United States are still by an American election, only then the americans will inevitably
because of their political rights as "privileged". Other ethnic people may not agree with this order of inequality.
Us power, super hard nor soft power is strong. In today's world the influence of the tough to beat. This is the reality of the world today www.ajsdjj.com. But the influence and
leadership are not equal. In fact, the nation state as the basic of the international system, any country can truly lead the world, can do it in the national strength and the domestic governance mode more is not easy. Compared with the so-called lead the world this big and empty slogans, accelerating globalization, optimizing the differences between countries than solve the problem of mechanism is more meaningful.
In the end, this is the fate of the nation state as the unit of the international system. Mr Obama's fear is also on the premise of the system to make the announcement, because he is the speech object is the American people, he himself is the candidate of President of the United States. I'm afraid the head of any one country say he won't be welcome in other countries, because this necessarily implies that the connotation of "one country" over the world. This may let the American people feel useful, but people in other countries there is not.
Play a leading role in a country in a state of groups is often the case, whether the
Westphalia system or Vienna system, or the world of before and after the end of the cold war have this feature. NATO is a classic. Obama claimed that if the United States will lead NATO for a long time, that is more persuasive. Just, the national group of the existence of all to conflicts with another organizational principle and its group of countries or states the premise. Under such logic, a leading the www.makayikanggw.com world is only a madrassa reflected more. Such as during the cold war, under the leadership of the Warsaw pact would not be in the United States.
Really push the international system away from the turmoil to good governance is not a country's leadership, but rather where countries interests closely link of globalisation. In economy, dealing with common challenges in the areas of common interests, the interests
of the differences between countries tend to be relegated to the strategic decision makers second-line goal, let the outbreaks of unrest, against space greatly compressed. How to accelerate the globalization process, strengthen the common interests of all countries, this is why Mr Obama should consider a lot of things.
For China, no matter what the americans say, are also should be clear over the years always will offer a inexhaustible driving force for national development and escort for the what is, that is exactly the profound benefits of globalization process. Easily without this, the international system, China's rapid development of the stability of the environment may be long gone. China's diplomacy has become increasingly aggressive under the new leadership, this is a significant trend. Not only in the more aggressively to maintain their own geopolitical interests, fighting for, but also in the west more confident, direct speech on the counter. Barack Obama's declaration of "leading the world" is also the Chinese foreign ministry top back.
Tactical level can be more active, the mouth can be more confident, but never because western said something or done what is on the strategic ignore China and the west in the economic and the common interests of dealing with the common threats. Mr Obama is not little avail, the United States to China's containment is annoying, but if so let diplomacy towards China and the west against the orbit, it is ill advised. If you want to work in the United States, let him pick. China doesn't have to die with them. "S" is deng xiaoping's teachings. Continue to draw nutrients from global cooperation, continues to do your own thing is the wise choice of China.
美华媒：中国应坚持“不出头”遗训 不必与美争锋
美国《侨报》网5月31日文章，原题：且让美国“领导世界”
中国只需做好自己美国总统奥巴马在西点军校的演讲中强调美国将在未来领导世界。奥巴马的宣示有一个根本矛盾：以一国去领导世界。如是这样，那么这“一国”的领导人该对谁负责呢？是这“一国”还是全世界？如果美国真的要领导全世界，那么它做好由全世界人民来选举美国总统的准备了么？如果没有，那么这个所谓“美国领导世界”将长久地作为“美国梦”存在。因为，如若美国领导世界，美国总统却仍只由美国人选举，那么美国人势必因为手中的政治权利而成为“特权阶层”。其他民族的人民们怕是不会同意这种不平等秩序的。
美国国力超群，软硬实力俱强。在当今世界的影响力无出其右者。这是当今世界的现实。但影响力与领导力并不等同。其实，民族国家为基本组成的这个国际体系中，任何一个国家都不可能做到真正的领导世界，能够做到在国力和国内治理模式上独领风骚已然不易。相比于所谓领导世界这种大而空的口号，不如在加速全球化发展、优化国家间分歧解决机制等更有实质意义的问题上下功夫。
说到底，这是以民族国家为单位的国际体系的宿命。奥巴马先生怕也是以该体系为前提做出这番表态的，因为他此次演讲的对象是美国民众，他本人更是美国人选出来的总统。恐怕任何一国的元首说出此言都不会受到其他国家的欢迎，因为这话必然隐含着那“一国”凌驾于世界的内涵。这话或许让美国民众感觉受用，但在其他国家民众那里就不是那么回事了。
一国在某一国家群体中发挥领导作用倒是常有的事，无论威斯特伐利亚体系还是维也纳体系，亦或是冷战结束前后的世界都呈现这一特征。北约恰是一个典型。奥巴马若声言美国将长久领导北约，那倒是更能服人。只是，国家群的存在无不以与另一个组织原则与其相悖的国家群或国家的对抗为前提。如此逻辑下，所谓领导世界就更只能是无源之水。如在冷战时期，华约就不在美国的领导之下。
真正推动国际体系远离动荡走向善治的不是某一国的领导地位，而是让各国利益紧密联结的全球化进程。在经济、应对共同挑战等领域的共同利益面前，国家间的利益分歧往往会退居各国战略决策者二线目标行列，让动荡、对抗的爆发空间大大压缩。如何加速全球化进程，夯实各国共同利益，这才是奥巴马们该多多考虑的事情。
对于中国来说，无论美国人说了什么，都同样应当清楚这些年来始终为国家发展提供不竭动力并为其保驾护航的是什么，那恰恰也是全球化进程带来的各国深厚的利益联结。若无此，国际体系轻易异动，中国快速发展的稳定大环境也许早已不复存在。中国外交在新领导层主政之下变得愈发进取，这是明显的趋势。这不仅体现在对自身地缘利益更积极地去维护、争取，更体现在对西方言论更加自信、直接的反驳上。此次奥巴马的“领导世界”宣言同样被中国外交部顶了回去。
战术层面可以更加主动，嘴上可以更加自信，但千万不可因为西方说了什么或做了什么就在战略上忽视中国与西方在经济及应对共同威胁时的共同利益。奥巴马的话固然不受听，美国对中国的围堵固然让人恼火，但若因此就让中国外交滑向了与西方对抗为主的轨道上，那无疑是有失明智的。美国如果要挑头，就让他挑好了。中国不必与之争锋。 “不出头”
是邓小平留下的遗训。继续从全球化合作中汲取养分，继续埋头做好自己的事情才是中国的智慧选择。
The network May 31 articles qiaobao, the original problem: and for the United States to "lead the world"
China need to do their U.S. President barack Obama's speech at west point highlighted in the United States will lead the world in the future. Barack Obama declared a fundamental paradox: a country to lead the world. So, then this to the "one country" leader who is responsible? Is this the "one country, or the world?" If America is to lead the world, do it well by people all over the world ready for the election of the President of the United States? If not, then the so-called "America lead the world" will be there for long as the "American dream". Because, if the United States leads the world, the President of the United States are still by an American election, only then the americans will inevitably
because of their political rights as "privileged". Other ethnic people may not agree with this order of inequality.
Us power, super hard nor soft power is strong. In today's world the influence of the tough to beat. This is the reality of the world today www.ajsdjj.com. But the influence and
leadership are not equal. In fact, the nation state as the basic of the international system, any country can truly lead the world, can do it in the national strength and the domestic governance mode more is not easy. Compared with the so-called lead the world this big and empty slogans, accelerating globalization, optimizing the differences between countries than solve the problem of mechanism is more meaningful.
In the end, this is the fate of the nation state as the unit of the international system. Mr Obama's fear is also on the premise of the system to make the announcement, because he is the speech object is the American people, he himself is the candidate of President of the United States. I'm afraid the head of any one country say he won't be welcome in other countries, because this necessarily implies that the connotation of "one country" over the world. This may let the American people feel useful, but people in other countries there is not.
Play a leading role in a country in a state of groups is often the case, whether the
Westphalia system or Vienna system, or the world of before and after the end of the cold war have this feature. NATO is a classic. Obama claimed that if the United States will lead NATO for a long time, that is more persuasive. Just, the national group of the existence of all to conflicts with another organizational principle and its group of countries or states the premise. Under such logic, a leading the www.makayikanggw.com world is only a madrassa reflected more. Such as during the cold war, under the leadership of the Warsaw pact would not be in the United States.
Really push the international system away from the turmoil to good governance is not a country's leadership, but rather where countries interests closely link of globalisation. In economy, dealing with common challenges in the areas of common interests, the interests
of the differences between countries tend to be relegated to the strategic decision makers second-line goal, let the outbreaks of unrest, against space greatly compressed. How to accelerate the globalization process, strengthen the common interests of all countries, this is why Mr Obama should consider a lot of things.
For China, no matter what the americans say, are also should be clear over the years always will offer a inexhaustible driving force for national development and escort for the what is, that is exactly the profound benefits of globalization process. Easily without this, the international system, China's rapid development of the stability of the environment may be long gone. China's diplomacy has become increasingly aggressive under the new leadership, this is a significant trend. Not only in the more aggressively to maintain their own geopolitical interests, fighting for, but also in the west more confident, direct speech on the counter. Barack Obama's declaration of "leading the world" is also the Chinese foreign ministry top back.
Tactical level can be more active, the mouth can be more confident, but never because western said something or done what is on the strategic ignore China and the west in the economic and the common interests of dealing with the common threats. Mr Obama is not little avail, the United States to China's containment is annoying, but if so let diplomacy towards China and the west against the orbit, it is ill advised. If you want to work in the United States, let him pick. China doesn't have to die with them. "S" is deng xiaoping's teachings. Continue to draw nutrients from global cooperation, continues to do your own thing is the wise choice of China.